Skip to Main Content

Communication

Look here for Oesterle Library resources on the subject of speech communication.

Blue news van icon
   Evaluating Journalism & News Sources

 

Sometimes it's difficult to determine whether the information presented via a news outlet is credible or not. Oesterle Librarians, in collaboration with Dr. Amy Grim Buxbaum, Associate Professor of Communication, and Dr. Stephen Maynard Caliendo, Professor of Political Science, offer the below resources and criteria for evaluating journalistic sources.

To determine the level of bias of sources (strength of identification with a political agenda), you may also visit the following websites:

Web Literacy and Online Fact Checking eBook

Criteria for Evaluating Journalism

icon showing a tv set, radio, and newspaper  Type

   What kind of content is this?

The format of the information (editorial, news story, opinion piece, advertisement, etc.) and who it was created is important information when evaluating journalism. You may need to look up information on the author or organization to learn more.

Icon showing a silhouette of a person wearing a black hat  Source

  Who are the sources cited and why should I believe them?

Who or what is the author citing as a source of information? Consider the authority or credentials of the source, including outside experts or publishers of studies or statistics.

icon of a colorful bar graph  Evidence

  What is the evidence and how was it vetted?

How did the journalist vet, or verify, the evidence presented by the sources? More credible authors will explicitly describe their method for verifying the information they present to support their point.

icon of a colorful curved path  Interpretation

  Is the main point of the piece proven by the evidence?

If the source is built around an idea or a main point, consider whether the conclusions offered by the author are supported by the evidence presented. Remember that correlation (two things happening together or in sequence) does not equal causation (one thing causing another). Quality sources will spend time discussing multiple sides of an issue and noting any gaps in knowledge before making a claim or argument.

puzzle pieces icon  Completeness

  What is missing?

What questions do you have after reading the source? Did anything seem to be missing?

icon of a cartoon brain inside of a lightbulb  Knowledge

  Am I learning what I need?

After reading the source, could you describe the issue to someone? Do you feel like you understand multiple sides of the issue? What else do you want to learn, and where could you go to learn it?

This information was adapted from Rosenstiel's 2013 article, "Six questions that will tell you what media to trust," linked above.



© 2025 North Central College. All rights reserved.