Skip to Main Content

Using AI Tools in Your Research

While some professors may allow limited use of ChatGPT or other generative AI tools with proper citation, unauthorized use of these tools may constitute plagiarism and lead to academic dishonesty sanctions.

According to the Student Handbook,

"Plagiarism means offering of someone else’s words, ideas or conceptions as if they were one’s own. Students are indeed encouraged to draw upon the information and wisdom of others, but in the spirit of scholarship they are always expected to state such indebtedness so that a) their own creativity can be justly appreciated and b) their use of sources, like a scientist’s experiment, can be verified by others. Plagiarism differs from this productive use of sources in that the similarity of the original and the borrowings are very close; it is acknowledged inexactly or not at all; and it shows little or no creative application by the borrower. Plagiarism is a prime intellectual offense in that the borrower is faking the learning process. No learning community can thrive if its members counterfeit their achievements, deceive their teachers, and take unfair advantage of their fellow students. Since the integrity of the whole academic community is thus at stake, the penalties are high."

ChatGPT as a Source of Information

Before using ChatGPT as a source of information, consider that ChatGPT...

  • may provide false, biased, or contradictory information. 
  • may be unable to provide specific sources for the information it shares. 
  • may generate false citations. 

Citing ChatGPT



© 2025 North Central College. All rights reserved.